Critical COVID-19 patients through first, second, and third wave: retrospective observational study comparing outcomes in intensive care unit.

Background: The time-course of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was characterized by subsequent waves identified by peaks of intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates. During these periods, progressive knowledge of the disease led to the development of specific therapeutic strategies. This retrospective study investigates whether this led to improvement in outcomes of COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU. Methods: Outcomes were evaluated in consecutive adult COVID-19 patients admitted to our ICU, divided into three waves based on the admission period: the first wave from February 25th, 2020, to July 6th, 2020; the second wave from September 20th, 2020, to February 13th, 2021; the third wave from February 14th, 2021 to April 30th, 2021. Differences were assessed comparing outcomes and by using different multivariable Cox models adjusted for variables related to outcome. Further sensitivity analysis was performed in patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Results: Overall, 428 patients were included in the analysis: 102, 169, and 157 patients in the first, second, and third wave. The ICU and in-hospital crude mortalities were lower by 7% and 10% in the third wave compared to the other two waves (P>0.05). A higher number of ICU- and hospital-free days at day 90 was found in the third wave when compared to the other two waves (P=0.001). Overall, 62.6% underwent invasive ventilation, with decreasing requirement during the waves (P=0.002). The adjusted Cox model showed no difference in the hazard ratio (HR) for mortality among the waves. In the propensity-matched analysis the hospital mortality rate was reduced by 11% in the third wave (P=0.044). Conclusions: With application of best practice as known by the time of the first three waves of the pandemic, our study failed to identify a significant improvement in mortality rate when comparing the different waves of the COVID-19 pandemic, notwithstanding, the sub-analyses showed a trend in mortality reduction in the third wave. Rather, our study identified a possible positive effect of dexamethasone on mortality rate reduction and the increased risk of death related to bacterial infections in the three waves.

Revisited Hyperoxia Pathophysiology in the Perioperative Setting: A Narrative Review.

The widespread use of high-dose oxygen, to avoid perioperative hypoxemia along with WHO-recommended intraoperative hyperoxia to reduce surgical site infections, is an established clinical practice. However, growing pathophysiological evidence has demonstrated that hyperoxia exerts deleterious effects on many organs, mainly mediated by reactive oxygen species. The purpose of this narrative review was to present the pathophysiology of perioperative hyperoxia on surgical wound healing, on systemic macro and microcirculation, on the lungs, heart, brain, kidneys, gut, coagulation, and infections. We reported here that a high systemic oxygen supply could induce oxidative stress with inflammation, vasoconstriction, impaired microcirculation, activation of hemostasis, acute and chronic lung injury, coronary blood flow disturbances, cerebral ischemia, surgical anastomosis impairment, gut dysbiosis, and altered antibiotics susceptibility. Clinical studies have provided rather conflicting results on the definitions and outcomes of hyperoxic patients, often not speculating on the biological basis of their results, while this review highlighted what happens when supranormal PaO2 values are reached in the surgical setting. Based on the assumptions analyzed in this study, we may suggest that the maintenance of PaO2 within physiological ranges, avoiding unnecessary oxygen administration, may be the basis for good clinical practice.

Effects of cytokine blocking agents on hospital mortality in patients admitted to ICU with acute respiratory distress syndrome by SARS-CoV-2 infection: retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The use of cytokine-blocking agents has been proposed to modulate the inflammatory response in patients with COVID-19. Tocilizumab and anakinra were included in the local protocol as an optional treatment in critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) by SARS-CoV-2 infection. This cohort study evaluated the effects of therapy with cytokine blocking agents on in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients requiring mechanical ventilation and admitted to intensive care unit. METHODS: The association between therapy with tocilizumab or anakinra and in-hospital mortality was assessed in consecutive adult COVID-19 patients admitted to our ICU with moderate to severe ARDS. The association was evaluated by comparing patients who received to those who did not receive tocilizumab or anakinra and by using different multivariable Cox models adjusted for variables related to poor outcome, for the propensity to be treated with tocilizumab or anakinra and after patient matching. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients who received immunotherapy (49 tocilizumab, 17 anakinra) and 28 patients who did not receive immunotherapy were included. The in-hospital crude mortality was 30,3% in treated patients and 50% in nontreated (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.56-1.05, p=0.069). The adjusted Cox model showed an association between therapy with immunotherapy and in-hospital mortality (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19-0.83, p=0.015). This protective effect was further confirmed in the analysis adjusted for propensity score, in the propensity-matched cohort and in the cohort of patients with invasive mechanical ventilation within 2 hours after ICU admission. CONCLUSIONS: Although important limitations, our study showed that cytokine-blocking agents seem to be safe and to improve survival in COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU with ARDS and the need for mechanical ventilation.

Surfactant replacement might help recovery of low-compliance lung in severe COVID-19 pneumonia.

The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

Adjunctive therapy with vitamin c and thiamine in patients treated with steroids for refractory septic shock: A propensity matched before-after, case-control study.

PURPOSE: Triple therapy with steroids, vitamin C and thiamine has been recently proposed as a safe and beneficial in patients with sepsis. In 2017, we added the use of intravenous vitamin C and thiamine in septic shock patients receiving low dose hydrocortisone because poorly responsive to vasopressors. Aim of this study is to verify whether triple therapy rather than steroids alone can improve outcome in patients with refractory shock. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this before-after retrospective analysis, we compared septic shock patients admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU) who received triple therapy from June 2017 to November 2019 to septic shock patients who received only hydrocortisone from January 2015 to June 2017. Patients of the two study periods were matched 1:1 using a propensity score model. RESULTS: A final cohort of 56 patients treated with triple therapy were matched to 56 patients treated only with steroids. Triple therapy reduced the length of mechanical ventilation (p = 0,01) and showed a trend in lowering the 30-day and hospital mortality compared to therapy with only hydrocortisone. CONCLUSIONS: Although with significant limitations, our experience indicated that triple therapy seems to provide an improvement of clinical outcomes in patients with refractory septic shock.